Im sorry if this has been covered since there are already posts on here about eupho vs. helix, but I see most people asking about the helix vs. the eupho. I have the (original) helix, and while I its ok, I noticed two things: the pressure is either too intense (mostly the dime p-tab, which has been taken care of in the trident), and that it feels like it falls a cm short of my prostate. Sure, if I contract hard, I can feel it sort of go further and sit in a nice spot, but it won’t really stay there on it’s own. I also like that feeling of that movement, but wish it didn’t require some much effort to work. Does the eupho go that little bit deeper? it looks like its designed to move more, which I think id like, so long as the depth was there as well. I was also wondering how the MGX stacks up, since the base is a little different as its ribbed and has a different shape. i dont think id like the progasm, but Id be happy to be convinced otherwise. Opposing opinions welcome!
3 comments
Comments are closed.
I aligned all 3 Tridents so that the ptabs and k-tabs are together, and Helix was a few mm longer than the Eupho and MGX was a few mm longer still. This was unexpected. The Eupho looks longer but the p-tab arm is deeper so not as much of the Eupho goes inside as you might expect.
Eupho and MGX both looked more forward-facing agressive than Helix when aligned to the 2 tabs. Speculation really, it could feel different when inside you.
Maximus might be longer, no, it’s about the same as MGX just thicker and different shape.
​
Good luck to you! None of mine have ever brought me orgasms.
You might also consider the Tempo, or Peridise, especially if the tabs on other models are the issue, as these models have none.
Most of the models you mentioned I’m also on the fence for purchasing (and mostly for the same reason). If/when you pick some up, please leave some feedback. I’d love to hear what you thought of them; those things aren’t cheap after all.